30 Days of Supernatural: Day Two

[rogueslayer452]

Day 02: Your least favorite character

Anna Milton

Just, ugh. I hated everything about this character from the moment she was introduced. She just had no point or purpose whatsoever, she just stood there and did nothing and was just annoying to the max. Her storyline was lame and sucked so hard that I practically pretend it never existed in the first place (I mean, grace in a tree? Seriously Kripke, seriously?) and the actress herself was just so painful to watch, such cardboard acting it was embarrassing. I've disliked characters before, but never on this kind of level of outright irrational rage that I have with her. I mean seriously, every time she appeared on the screen I wanted to punch her in the face, with her being incredibly self-righteous and acting like some special little snowflake when in reality she was incredibly irrelevant and amounted to nothing whatsoever to the show. So yeah, I'm glad they killed her off as brutally as they did. Good riddance.

ALSO? BITCH KILLED URIEL. URIEL WAS FAR MORE INTERESTING OF A CHARACTER THAN HER STUPID ASS, BECAUSE AT LEAST HE HAD PERSONALITY AND WAS PRODUCTIVE AND SHIT, OH AND THE ACTOR COULD ACTUALLY ACT AND NOT BE SO DAMN WOODEN WITH EVERYTHING. UGH WHY SHOW, WHY GET RID OF FANTASTIC CHARACTERS ONLY TO KEEP THE STUPIDLY WEAKEST ONES? FFS GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT SHOW, JFC. >:/

Runners up: Lisa, who is to a lesser extent because I liked her before they meaninglessly brought her back to fuck everything up with her character. For that I blame the writers. -__- Ruby v2.0 because that was such a disappointment and letdown from how awesome she had been in the third season. Also Grandfather Campbell, because he's a sketchy douchebag who needs to get his story straight. In fact, most of the Campbells really I just don't like in general. I also have to say Sam Winchester in these later seasons. I don't hate him, but I don't love him either. I'm mainly just indifferent towards Sam these days, which might get me burned at the stake for saying so in this fandom, but that's just how I feel.


Rest of the 30 Days of Supernatural Challenge.

In slightly more upbeat news, upcoming episode spoilers are happy-making. \O/ I love that Jim Beaver is kinda like the Gossip Girl of the entire SPN fandom. He just likes revealing all sorts of stuff, and thinking he might not get in trouble for it. ;p COME TALK WITH ME ABOUT THIS BBS, LET US SPECULATE AND MAKE CRACK THEORIES ON THIS!

Comments

[rogueslayer452.livejournal.com]

I can now imagine Sam at the end of 5.22, appearing outside Lisa's. *watches* "Huh. There's Dean." *shrugs* "I should go kill something."

I laughed at this, because that is precisely how it must have been in that scene. He's so nonchalant about it, hehe.

I think Dean ending up on his own after 5.22 would have made SO much more sense. But then we wouldn't have had ANY conflict when Sam came back

I'm not entirely sure. Just dismiss the domesticated aspect and perhaps change things around to where Sam just didn't let anyone know he had been back, there could have been plenty of conflict and questions and mysterious lead-up instead of the confusing state of things the premiere had setup. I think that would have been more plausible than what occurred, to be honest, and would have kept the audience interested.

Exactly. Non-hunter does not automatically mean suburbia. Look and Bobby. Look at Ellen.

I'm wondering why that wasn't brought up at all, and Bobby's words were like "oh but you got out of the life!" Yeah, but living a complete and utter lie Bobby. That's not how to live it. At least with Ellen's case she stayed partially with the hunting but didn't do it herself, she had a steady job. I think the show is really thinking APPLE PIE LIFE ALL IS WELL instead of realistic approaches, even if this was supposedly a misjudgment and lesson learned on Dean's part (I think?) it doesn't compute how he would go from being damaged to thinking intruding on another person's normal life was okay. Dean Winchester would never do that, even if fucked up in the head after everything.

YES. Was SAM that rusty after FOUR YEARS of being at college?

THANK YOU.

Perhaps some do the argument of "BUT THEY ARE ~~DIFFERENT~~" but that is rather a bullshit excuse. There really is no other explanation other than the sloppiness of the show and how they lack consistency in their own character history.

[silverusagi]

Just dismiss the domesticated aspect and perhaps change things around to where Sam just didn't let anyone know he had been back, there could have been plenty of conflict and questions and mysterious lead-up

Well, that would have been conflict that made sense! We can't have things making sense! But I really think they got fixated on the old Dean life/new Dean life conflict, which was dumb and pointless. Also, I would have LOVED for NO ONE to know that Sam was back. That he didn't care to contact anyone in his new soulless state.

"oh but you got out of the life!" Yeah, but living a complete and utter lie Bobby.

Also, Bobby can "get out" any time he wants. No one's forcing Bobby to hunt. Nor does he have a personal vendetta that needs avenging (YED) or an Apocalypse to stop.

[rogueslayer452.livejournal.com]

Also, I would have LOVED for NO ONE to know that Sam was back. That he didn't care to contact anyone in his new soulless state.

It definitely would have made more sense than the mess we were given, that's for sure.

Also, Bobby can "get out" any time he wants. No one's forcing Bobby to hunt. Nor does he have a personal vendetta that needs avenging (YED) or an Apocalypse to stop.

OMG, you are so right about that. Granted I'm sure he's sticking around because of all the help he offers as we've seen in "Weekend At Bobby's" and that he probably is the safety net for many other hunters due to all of his resources, however that doesn't mean he couldn't just pack up and move elsewhere and start his life over. Or perhaps he feels obligated to continue in that life because there's nothing else left due to his wife and that's been something he has to continue living in, idk.

It's an interesting kind of mentality some hunters have. Some feel the need for vengeance and others feel like they need redemption for something, while others just hunt because they like it. I wish we could get more details on hunters and why they hunt, because it seems rather bleak and depressing with all the trust issues and whatnot.

[silverusagi]

I'm sure Bobby is a resource and net for other hunters. But from his attitude in 6.01 or 6.02, he made it sound like a horrible horrible life that Dean was so lucky to escape from or something. Not that being a hunter isn't horrible, if you know what I mean. But clearly, everyone gets into the life for a different reason, and then stays with it (if they don't get killed) because they choose to. For whatever reason. I just hate that Bobby basically took it upon himself to make Dean's decisions for him. He knew Dean would come running back to Sam, so he didn't tell him about Sam. It's just so hypocritical. Also, it irks me that there's this notion that traditional family is the only thing worth having. Bobby's wife is dead, so he will keep hunting. But Dean "has something" so he deserves to get out. YOU CAN GET OUT AND BE ON YOUR OWN. IT'S NOT "FAMILY MAN" OR "HUNTER." THERE ARE A TON OF SINGLE PEOPLE WHO AREN'T HUNTERS IN THE WORLD.