NOW THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
Apr. 20th, 2011 04:35 amThe episode also marks the introduction of Castiel’s angel lieutenant, Rachel. And for those of you who pondered: No; she’s definitely not a romantic companion. Sorry, the real love-fest in this episode is between Cas and Bobby, who share some really great moments, particularly when one of them finds themselves caring for the other.
BOBBY AND CASTIEL BROMANCE? HELL YES PLEASE!
APPARENTLY THIS EPISODE IS GONNA BE WRITTEN BY THE SAME PERSON WHO DID "WEEKEND AT BOBBY'S" THEREFORE I SENSE AN EXTENSION TO THAT WITH THEM BEING ALL GRUMPY AND BONDING BY SHARING THEIR MUTUAL BITCHING ABOUT HOW THEY DON'T GET ENOUGH APPRECIATION AND HOW SELF-INVOLVED THE WINCHESTERS ARE AS THEY ALWAYS TAKE THEM FOR GRANTED, ETC AND SO FORTH. IF ONLY WE HAD RUFUS IN THE MIX IT'D BE TWO GRUMPY HUNTERS AND AN ANGEL AND, HELL YEAH, I'D WATCH THAT SITCOM. TOTALLY.
I WONDER WHO WILL BE WHUMPED, BOBBY OR CASTIEL? DOESN'T MATTER, BECAUSE THE WORD CARING IS IMPORTANT HERE. SINCE WHEN DOES THAT HAPPEN TO THESE TWO? ♥ ♥ ♥
THEY WILL BE LIKE WILLIAM ADAMA AND SAUL TIGH FROM BSG....ONE STOIC, THE OTHER GRUMBLING AND GRUMPY, BUT BROMANCING ALWAYS. IDK WHY I'M MAKING THIS PARALLEL BUT IT MAKES SENSE IN MY HEAD, OKAY? I SWEAR WE NEED MORE CAS/BOBBY MOMENTS SINCE I'VE BEEN WANTING THAT FOR LIKE, OH, EVER M'KAY?
ALSO, THIS.....
Bonus scoop: Dean has a “fetish,” and we learn what that is. It might be related to something I already mentioned.
ASSLESS CHAPS OR I'M OUT. ;P
JK, HOWEVER IT MAKES ME WONDER WHAT OTHER "FETISH" DEAN HAS BESIDES WEARING SILKY WOMEN'S UNDERWEAR.
SIDENOTE: GLAD TO HEAR THAT RACHEL IS NOT A ROMANTIC INTEREST. HOWEVER, THAT'S JUST ONE CHECKED OFF THE LIST. WE STILL HAVE THE "SHE'S SECRETLY EVIL" OR "SHE'LL DIE IMMEDIATELY" (OR BOTH) TO GO THROUGH.
SO EXCITED FOR THIS EP. HOWEVER, ONE THING: THEY BETTER MAKE A SPACE COWBOYS JOKE OR REFERENCE OTHERWISE, MAJOR FAIL.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-20 01:42 pm (UTC)THIS IS GOING TO MAKE WHATEVER HAPPENS IN 6.20 EVEN WORSE, ISN'T IT? BONDING NOW, SUSPICION LATER. :(
BUT THANK GOD RACHEL ISN'T A LOVE INTEREST.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-20 08:50 pm (UTC)